This analytical work by Dr. Eduard Mark of the Center for Air Force History examines the practice of air interdiction in three wars: World War II; the Korean war; and the war in Southeast Asia. It considers eleven important interdiction campaigns; all of them American or Anglo-American; for only the United States and Great Britain had the resources to conduct interdiction campaigns on a large scale in World War II. Dr. Mark proposes what he considers to be a realistic objective for interdiction: preventing men; equipment; and supplies from reaching the combat area when the enemy needs them and in the quantity he requires. As Mark notes; there has been little intensive scholarship on the subject of interdiction especially when contrasted with the work done on strategic bombardment. In the wake of the Persian Gulf war; the reader will no doubt be impressed by the comparatively low performance of weapons in these pre-Gulf war campaigns. DESERT STORM showed that recent advances in technology had enabled interdiction to reach new levels of effectiveness; especially in night operations. Yet; as the reader soon discovers; interdiction in the pre-Gulf campaigns sometimes profoundly influenced military operations. As is often the case in military history; the effects were often serendipitous-not as planned or anticipated; but present nevertheless. By the middle of the Second World War; aircraft were already demonstrating that they could have a devastating impact upon a military force's ability to wage war. Field Marshal Erwin Rommel; for example; complained bitterly during the North African and Normandy campaigns about air power that; in his memorable words; "pinned my army to the ground" and otherwise denied his forces both supplies and the ability to freely maneuver.
#5372443 in Books 1986-06Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.50 x 6.75 x 1.00l; #File Name: 0899064760256 pages
Review