Destroying conventional historical wisdom; acclaimed military historian Bevin Alexander reveals how the South most definitely could have defeated the North-and how close a Confederate victory came to happening. Alexander shows: •How the Confederacy had its greatest chance to win the war just three months into the fighting-but blew it• How the Confederacy’s three most important leaders- President Jefferson Davis and Generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson– clashed over how to fight the war• How the Confederate army devised–but never fully exploited–a way tonegate the Union’s huge advantages in manpower and weaponry• How Abraham Lincoln and other Northern leaders understood the Union’s vulnerability better than the Confederacy’s leaders didHow the South Could Have Won the Civil War provides a startling account of how a relatively small number of tactical and strategic mistakes cost the South the war and changed the course of history.
#1099221 in Books 2016-03-22 2016-03-22Format: Deckle EdgeOriginal language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.50 x 1.30 x 6.50l; 1.25 #File Name: 0307271668384 pages
Review
9 of 13 people found the following review helpful. Interesting book to read.By Rod WinderInteresting book to read. A bit heavy on the development of religious understanding through ability of paper as a cheap media to provide access of thought to the masses and loss of power of those controlling by ignorance16 of 23 people found the following review helpful. In depth history of paper; but also very long and not enough pictures!By KiwifloraIt is highly unlikely that you are reading this review on a piece of paper held in your hand. And yet; it was the invention of paper that enabled mass communication and exchange of information quickly and effectively. Now we have the internet rapidly replacing the likes of the daily newpaper; but we must cast a thought back to where it all began. First produced over 2000 years ago in China; paper very quickly replaced bamboo as a writing surface and from then on was unstoppable in its spread. Although; it was not till over 1000 years later that paper made its way in a westerly direction to what is now Iran; Iraq; then Turkey to Europe.The movement and development of paper has been integral to the history of these regions over the last 2000 years. As a form of storing religious texts; whether they be Buddhist as in the early centuries of paper use in China; the Koran or the Bible; as a means of distributing religious messages amongst the populace as seen in the work of Martin Luther in the 1500s looking for an alternative to the Catholic church; or as fuel to the French Revolution in the late 18th century; paper has been at the centre of it all..Even New Zealand's very own Treaty of Waitangi has two pages in this book devoted to it. Apparently the Treaty was a very rare type of document in British imperial history; in that it was a bilingual document - Maori and English - drawn up for both sides to sign. Which is what happened. Although as we now know; the two versions actually had two different meanings. However it is considered remarkable for its time; as it attempted to come to a political settlement without going to war. The author also points out that when the Treaty was signed in 1840; the Maori had only had maybe 20 years of exposure to the written word; their entire means of communicating and passing on history up to that time being oral in nature. Is it any wonder they are such marvellous story tellers?This research undertaken for this book is enormous; and how much the author has put in is mind boggling. The author has studied Chinese and lived for a time in Beijing; so it is hardly surprising that half of this book is about the invention; development and spread of paper in China; Eastern and Central Asia - the first 1000 years. I am not entirely sure how one makes 1000 years of paper making interesting and riveting; and at times I found myself nodding off. The seond 1000 years is easier to digest as it has much more relevance to history that we already know about. Nevertheless; I wouldn't say this book is an 'easy' read. The detail and minutiae of his subject is at times overwhelming; to the extent that I felt the thread of many of his stories was getting lost.There has been a trend in recent years for non-fiction writers to undertake histories of items/inventions that have been crucial to the development of the world we know and live in; and write about it in a way that makes it accessible to the average reader. For example "E=mc2" by David Bodanis takes Albert Einstein's famous equation and explains it in such a way the most unmathematical persons in the world could understand. This book is not on the same accessible level as the likes of "E=mc2".My biggest criticism - the almost total lack of illustrations. In a book of 368 pages there are only seventeen illustrations. I don't understand how a book about paper and it's place in modern history can only have seventeen; low quality illustrations. There is whole chapter devoted to the Renaissance and the use of paper in the creation of some of the beautiful art works from that time. Any illustrations from this time? No. Any pictures of some of the beautifully and crafted Bibles of the Middle Ages? No. Or the copies of the Koran produced by the Islamic Caliphate? No. I kept wanting to see pictures of what the author was writing about. Disappointing for a book with so much research and information in it.But if you have the time and want to know where paper; the development of script; binding; typography; the printing press; the concept of reading; the disbursement of knowledge sprang from; then you will get a lot out of reading this book.
