In an insightful exploration of gender relations during the Civil War; Nina Silber compares broad ideological constructions of masculinity and femininity among Northerners and Southerners. She argues that attitudes about gender shaped the experiences of the Civil War's participants; including how soldiers and their female kin thought about their "causes" and obligations in wartime. Despite important similarities; says Silber; differing gender ideologies shaped the way each side viewed; participated in; and remembered the war.Silber finds that rhetoric on both sides connected soldiers' reasons for fighting to the women left at home. Consequently; although in different ways; women on both sides took up new roles to advance the wartime agenda. At the same time; both Northern and Southern women were accused of waning patriotism as the war dragged on; but their responses to such charges differed. Finally; noting that our postwar memories are often dominated by images of Southern belles; Silber considers why Northern women; despite their heroic contributions to the Union cause; have faded from Civil War memory. Silber's investigation offers a new understanding of how Unionists and Confederates perceived their reasons for fighting; of the new attitudes and experiences that women--black and white--on both sides took up; and of the very different ways that Northern and Southern women were remembered after the war ended.
#315130 in Books 2014-06-15Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.75 x 1.00 x 6.50l; 1.25 #File Name: 1469614278296 pages
Review
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful. A new way of looking at the origins of the U.S. woman suffrage movementBy Nathaniel LevinThe publication of "The Myth of Seneca Falls" is a big event for those of us who like to live in the suffrage world. Professor Tetrault has come up with the first really effective counter-narrative to Eleanor Flexner's classic "Century of Struggle".Professor Tetrault argues convincingly that the famous Seneca Falls convention of 1848 was only part of a flow of many events with at least equal claims to our attention. She "foregrounds" the work of Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony as writers of women's history. It was Stanton and Anthony who in later years promoted the supposed significance of Seneca Falls. They did so to place themselves at the center of a movement that was in fact widespread and chaotic; with contested and scattered leadership. With the tale of Seneca Falls; they won the fight for the minds of the public and movement activists. In time; this led to the preeminence of Anthony as a suffrage icon and some degree of centralization in leadership.Tetrault's account does not go on into the 20th century; in my view the partial centralization of the movement around the image of Anthony as revered pioneer had important benefits in later stages. Anthony's organization (the National American Woman Suffrage Association) served as a launching pad for the careers of Carrie Chapman Catt and Alice Paul; who played vital roles as the movement built to tremendous dynamism and strength during the 1910s.One of the many merits of Tetrault's book is its discussion of the tension between the active; independent grassroots of the suffrage movement and the efforts of some to achieve a dominant national leadership. Again stepping beyond Tetrault's narrative; one way the story of the 1910s can be told is that many local successes; plus increased coordination and control at the center; led to a balance between local activism and central control that allowed the movement to successfully take on the political establishment.Tetrault's portrait of Susan B. Anthony is also a strong point. As presented by Tetrault; Anthony is ambitious; forceful; sometimes ruthless; and an effective striver for power and influence. Anthony's success in her maneuvers not only won her fame; but also--as I have indicated above--benefited the movement by providing Anthony as its rallying point. Tetrault is right in noting that Anthony has not yet found her biographer; in spite of some prior attempts. Tetrault's version of Anthony is far more rounded and human than any other I have encountered.While I would still recommend "Century of Struggle" as the first book to read about the suffrage movement; anyone who has a serious interest in the subject will also have to read Professor Tetrault's book. It is clear now that much of the "plot" of Flexner's book was a creation of Stanton and Anthony; and that there is more work to be done in weaving still more narratives of the great battle for women's voting rights in the U.S.3 of 3 people found the following review helpful. The Big PictureBy carol j. saylorFor those of us who live in the Seneca Falls area and had grandmothers and a great grandmothers who marched with "the ladies of the myth" this book is a good reminder for us to look "at the big picture" when talking about the Women's Suffrage Movement.0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Five StarsBy brendaThis is a great history of the women's movement in America. So may things I did not know.
