How could a Jew kill a Jew for religious and political reasons? Many people asked this question after an Orthodox Jew assassinated Israeli Prime Minister Itshak Rabin in 1995. But historian Michael Stanislawski couldn't forget it; and he decided to find out everything he could about an obscure and much earlier event that was uncannily similar to Rabin's murder: the 1848 killing--by an Orthodox Jew--of the Reform rabbi of Lemberg (now L'viv; Ukraine). Eventually; Stanislawski concluded that this was the first murder of a Jewish leader by a Jew since antiquity; a prelude to twentieth-century assassinations of Jews by Jews; and a turning point in Jewish history. Based on records unavailable for decades; A Murder in Lemberg is the first book about this fascinating case. On September 6; 1848; Abraham Ber Pilpel entered the kitchen of Rabbi Abraham Kohn and his family and poured arsenic in the soup that was being prepared for their dinner. Within hours; the rabbi and his infant daughter were dead. Was Kohn's murder part of a conservative Jewish backlash to Jewish reform and liberalization in a year of European revolution? Or was he killed simply because he threatened taxes that enriched Lemberg's Orthodox leaders? Vividly recreating the dramatic story of the murder; the trial that followed; and the political and religious fallout of both; Stanislawski tries to answer these questions and others. In the process; he reveals the surprising diversity of Jewish life in mid-nineteenth-century eastern Europe. Far from being uniformly Orthodox; as is often assumed; there was a struggle between Orthodox and Reform Jews that was so intense that it might have led to murder.
#3676386 in Books Princeton University Press 2001-10-01 2001-07-22Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.21 x .55 x 6.14l; .80 #File Name: 069108985X248 pages
Review
3 of 17 people found the following review helpful. Bland and not cohesiveBy A disappointed readerBland does not adequately connect the medieval and the modern; leaving a gap between the two periods. Further; he is clearly more adept at analyzing the medieval period as his discussion of the modern lacks the same level of critical penetration. In sum; I found Bland's book to be bland.