Southern Seed; Northern Soil captures the exceptional history of the Beech and Roberts settlements; two African-American and mixed-race farming communities on the Indiana frontier in the 1830s. Stephen Vincent analyzes the founders' backgrounds as a distinctive free people of color from the Old South. He traces the migration that culminated in the founding of the two communities. He follows the settlements' transformations through the pioneer and Civil War eras; and their gradual transition to commercial farming in the late 19th century. The Beech and Roberts story is at once part of and distinct from mainstream African-American history. Like other black Americans; the residents of these two communities had to straggle constantly to achieve freedom; autonomy; and economic well-being; yet they were able to defy the odds and thrive over several generations. Building on their advantages as late-18th-century landowners; they took root on the frontier and ultimately paved the way for their descendants' climb into the urban middle class.
#1052678 in Books 2010-05-07 2010-05-07Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.00 x 1.06 x 6.00l; 1.25 #File Name: 0253221765380 pages
Review
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful. Jewish Bialytok and Its DiasporaBy buddylakTwo of my Great Grandparents left in their early teens in the 1880s. s I had little family tradition about Bialystok and did not even know that it had been the great wool textile city of the Pale. The greatest revelation was the role that the well developed organized network of Bialystok landsmenshaften played in Jewish Bialystok's social and economic development from 1920 to 1947. Another surprising fact was the extent of the sacrifice that the Jewish workers of Bialystok were willing to offer in order to honor the Sabbath by choosing work in the non power loom sector at half the wages offered in the power loom secot. As an economist I would have appreciated a more numerical approach to the demographic; social and economic development of the city. A few tables and charts would have made me much happier.0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Five StarsBy MR PETER A SNOWExcellent book well researched and fascinating5 of 11 people found the following review helpful. Bialystok as a Model of the Litvak Situation from a Jewish ViewpointBy Jan PeczkisAlthough this work is centered on the Jews of Bialystok; it is useful to the reader for understanding the situation facing Jews in Russian-occupied Poland. Less attention is devoted to Bialystok in the resurrected Polish state (1918-1939); the German-Nazi Holocaust (1939-1945); and the post-WWII period (1945-on). The author also provides an impressive account of the Jewish diaspora in nations as separated as Argentina and the USA. Although Jewish-Polish relations are not the main subject of this work; I approach it from that viewpoint for purposes of this review.It is clear that Jewish separatism; and anti-Polishness; were a cause; and not consequence of Endek enmity against Jews. Shortly after the Partitions; while Bialystok was under Prussian rule; the following happened: "While the native Polish population remained steadfastly loyal to their `Polish province;' as Prussian officials dejectedly admitted; Jews embraced German culture." (p. 25).Then Russian rule began. The following separate paragraphs are quotations that show how the Jews had lost touch with Polish national aspirations; and had become an unwitting and witting tool of the Russian rulers over Poland: In place of national affiliation; then; these Jews--like those in Odessa; Warsaw; and St. Petersburg--viewed themselves through an urban regional lens. They were loyal Bialystokers; first and foremost; ambivalent and uncertain whether to identify themselves as devoted Russian subjects or as Jews of the Polish nation. (p. 25). Once Polish nationalist agitation intensified in the 1830's; though; the tsarist government...encouraged Jews; who despite their ambivalent relationship to the Russian state; were viewed as more loyal than Poles; to settle in Bialystok in order to diminish Polish revolutionary fervor. (p. 28). Moreover; the Polish rebellion of 1863 cemented Russian authorities' support for Jewish settlement and industrial expansion in Polish lands...an influx of Jews and new economic opportunities would help eliminate Polish nationalist fervor. (p. 29). By the end of the nineteenth century; however; approximately fifty thousand Jews lived in Bialystok; drawn to the town by its central position along the Russian railway system and tsarist authorities' support of Jewish settlement in Congress Poland as a means to quell Polish nationalist agitation. (p. 21).--End of paragraph quotes--Although Kobrin does not use the term Litwak (Litvak) migration; she alludes to it: "...Russia's uneven industrial development forced millions to move from small towns to large cities. As one can see vividly in the example of nineteenth century Bialystok; the dramatic movement of Jews within the western areas of the Russian Empire..." (p. 7). Jews came to account for 76% of Bialystok's population in 1897 before dropping to 48.4% as part of Poland's Second Republic. (p. 26).When the Polish state was resurrected in 1918; the Jews clearly sought special privileges--ones that would maintain and enhance their intense separatism. Through the League of Nations; they demanded special government-supported Jewish schools. (p. 289). Instead of conforming to the Polish nation as a minority group; Jews; through the Minorities Treaty; tried a role-reversal by trying to force the Polish nation to conform to them by recognizing Yiddish on an equal footing with Polish in public and official matters. (p. 137; 140).The Bialystok-area Jews then came out in open insubordination against the Polish nation; arrogating to themselves the privileges of a Judeopolonia (my term); that is; a fully sovereign Jewish nation on Polish soil. Jewish leaders demanded a plebiscite to determine whether Bialystok should remain part of Poland; or whether it should be part of Lithuania; the Soviet Union; or even its own special zone. (p. 138). This act of sedition enjoyed broad support among influential and foreign Jews: "Yiddish newspapers also argued unswervingly against Poland; claiming the annexation of Bialystok was illegal; given that less than one-third of the city's residents were Polish." (p. 138). "Emboldened by the absolute support of émigré philanthropists; the Yiddish press in Bialystok continued to question Polish sovereignty..." (p. 146). Local Kehilla leaders urged that Jews resist the draft into the Polish Army by providing false identification papers. (p. 139). The Polish reaction to the violation of their nation is not difficult to imagine.
