How; despite thirty years of effort; Soviet attempts to build a national computer network were undone by socialists who seemed to behave like capitalists.Between 1959 and 1989; Soviet scientists and officials made numerous attempts to network their nation -- to construct a nationwide computer network. None of these attempts succeeded; and the enterprise had been abandoned by the time the Soviet Union fell apart. Meanwhile; ARPANET; the American precursor to the Internet; went online in 1969. Why did the Soviet network; with top-level scientists and patriotic incentives; fail while the American network succeeded? In How Not to Network a Nation; Benjamin Peters reverses the usual cold war dualities and argues that the American ARPANET took shape thanks to well-managed state subsidies and collaborative research environments and the Soviet network projects stumbled because of unregulated competition among self-interested institutions; bureaucrats; and others. The capitalists behaved like socialists while the socialists behaved like capitalists. After examining the midcentury rise of cybernetics; the science of self-governing systems; and the emergence in the Soviet Union of economic cybernetics; Peters complicates this uneasy role reversal while chronicling the various Soviet attempts to build a "unified information network." Drawing on previously unknown archival and historical materials; he focuses on the final; and most ambitious of these projects; the All-State Automated System of Management (OGAS); and its principal promoter; Viktor M. Glushkov. Peters describes the rise and fall of OGAS -- its theoretical and practical reach; its vision of a national economy managed by network; the bureaucratic obstacles it encountered; and the institutional stalemate that killed it. Finally; he considers the implications of the Soviet experience for today's networked world.
#1213207 in Books Alan T Nolan 1998-10-22 1998-10-22Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.25 x .90 x 6.12l; 1.16 #File Name: 0253334578256 pagesGiants in Their Tall Black Hats Essays on the Iron Brigade
Review
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful. TomBy TomI have been reading quite a few books on the Iron Brigade; and I found this book to be a really good one on the brigade. I would highly recommend it.1 of 1 people found the following review helpful. Five StarsBy marsha hardwickgood4 of 4 people found the following review helpful. Iron BrigadeBy wtvfd801If your interest is in the Union's Iron Brigade of the Civil War; then this is the book you want to read. Not just read; but study. This one was one of the most informative books about the Iron Brigade and their conflicts of battle; that I have read and I have read many. The tactics of battle and the personal interest of the individuals involved from Generals to Privates is covered very well; almost to the point where you feel you come to know these brave; and sometimes not so brave; men. Highly recommended book and belongs in every Civil War buffs library.Ted Martin