Comparative Rhetoric is the first book to offer a cross-cultural overview of rhetoric as a universal feature of expression; composition; and communication. It begins with a theory of rhetoric as a form of mental and emotional energy which is transmitted from a speaker or writer to an audience or reader through a speech or text. In the first part of the book; George Kennedy explores analogies to human rhetoric in animal communication; possible rhetorical factors in the origin of human speech; and rhetorical conventions in traditionally oral societies in Australia; the South Pacific; Africa; and the Americas. Topics discussed include forms of reasoning; the function of metaphor; and the forms and uses of formal language. The second part of the book provides an account of rhetoric as understood and practiced in early literate societies in the Near East; China; India; Greece; and Rome; identifying unique or unusual features of Western discourse in comparison to uses elsewhere. The concluding chapter summarizes the results of the study and evaluates the validity of traditional Western rhetorical concepts in describing non-Western rhetoric. Addressing both what is general or common in all rhetorical traditions and what is unique or unusual in the Western tradition; Comparative Rhetoric is ideally suited for courses in rhetoric; rhetoric theory; the history of rhetoric; intercultural communication; linguistic anthropology; and comparative linguistics.
#1212192 in Books Robyn Muncy 1994-04-28Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 5.50 x .70 x 8.19l; .67 #File Name: 0195089243240 pagesCreating a Female Dominion in American Reform 1890 1935
Review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Five StarsBy Janet M. KellyGreat information!0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. An Interesting Bridge Between Social Reform of the 1890s and the New DealBy RDDIn "Creating a Female Dominion in American Reform; 1890-1935"; Robyn Muncy argues; within the network of female reform organizations; “female professionals and their followers preserved for the New Deal the reform values and strategies of the Progressive era†(pg. xii). Further; “this understanding of professionalism had profound implications for the continuation of reform in the early twentieth century†(pg. xiv). She believes “that the female professions created during the Progressive era contained as part of their professional creeds many of the commitments of the progressive reformers who gave them birth†(pg. xiv).Muncy begins with settlement organizations; such as Jane Addams’ Hull House; arguing that they laid the groundwork for later Progressive institutions. Muncy writes of the organizations; which used personal relationships as the basis of their social structure; “In the 1890s; women were thus creating a professional culture different from that of the older; male professions. One reason for the difference was that women entered the professional world most successfully when they carved out wholly new areas of expertise in which they did not compete with men for jobs or training†(pg. 20). Women worked within a system that expected them to focus on selflessness and sacrifice for the community. Muncy writes; “Only by justifying an occupation in terms of service to the dispossessed could professional women solicit such support†(pg. 22). A lack of reliable private patronage led women to focus their attention toward getting government sponsorship; counting them in Muncy’s opinion as “America’s first progressives†(pg. 27).The creation of the Children’s Bureau in 1912 offered women the opportunity to work on a national level. According to Muncy; “As these women moved their reforming strategies to the national government; their inclination to combine investigation and promotion encouraged them to advocate a more activist government than some of their male counterparts†(pg. 45). Discussing the development of social science; Muncy writes; “The peculiarities of the female search for professional opportunities begin to explain the continuity of progressivism among middle-class women†(pg. 73). Educated women; limited in their career prospects by the gendered dimension of the workforce; followed the paths others tread before them. According to Muncy; “During the implementation of the Maternity and Infancy Act; the Children’s Bureau and its subordinate organizations achieved their greatest power†(pg. 93). Women were able to weave together “the causes of child welfare reform and professional opportunity for women†(pg. 105). They used the auspices of the federal government for social engineering; though with a classist and racist bent. Muncy writes; “The professional arrogance and cultural chauvinism inherent in accusations of superstition [practiced by immigrants] also manifested themselves in campaigns to discipline midwives†(pg. 115). Muncy writes; “The implementation of the Sheppard-Towner Act…revealed some of the class; race; and ethnic identities that divided American women in the 1920s†(pg. 123). Muncy concludes; “Apparently the leadership within the dominion was so intent on keeping alive the values of the founders that it could not hear the new concerns of women that were surfacing in the 1920s and that would have required innovations in their program of child welfare policy†(pg. 162).Muncy’s work draws upon the techniques of gender history; unpacking the roles of women and men and how societal expectations circumscribed or opened new opportunities for them. She demonstrates; similarly to Michael McGerr in "A Fierce Discontent"; that the goals of Progressivism were to socially engineer society for what middle-class whites considered best using the power of the government. The techniques developed in Hill House offered a framework for women professionals when they entered government service.4 of 4 people found the following review helpful. A Unique Look at Progressive Era Reform to the New DealBy mwreviewIn "Creating a Female Dominion in American Reform;" Robyn Muncy described a "continuity of reform activities among America's middle-class; [Protestant] women" between the Progressive era and the New Deal. Muncy explained that; by reconciling traditional female roles with professionalization; these women reformers were able to create a "female dominion" in the filed of child welfare. Interestingly; this "dominion" was dismantled after the child welfare movement achieved its far-reaching success in New Deal legislation.Muncy presented an innovative and fair account of female participation in the Progressive movement. Unlike many historians who concluded the Progresive era with the end of the First World War; Muncy traced the activities of women reformers to the New Deal. Muncy also recognized the existence of class; ethnic; and racial tensions between reformers and the women they attempted to assist. Muncy; however; failed to cite any conflicts between the demands of the female patrons and the goals of the professional social workers. The laywomen who funded the work of the "female dominion" must have had significant influence over the acitivities of the reformers. Muncy expressed disappointment that the reformers did not open doors to other women; particularly to women who were mothers. Muncy; however; may be analyzing the social worker's Victorian ideas regarding motherhood and child-rearing from a post-World War II perspective. The "working mother" concept is a fairly recent phenomenon which; most likely; was not considered during the Progressive period. Finally; Muncy's account of the female reform movement may be too narrow. She followed the careers of a specific coterie of women while possibly ignoring female reform movements which operated outside the realm of Muncy's model of female Progressives. Otherwise; Muncy's work offered a convincing argument that continuity between the Progressive era and the New Deal existed through the "female dominion" in child welfare.