On War is a book on military strategy by Prussian general Carl von Clausewitz; written mostly after the Napoleonic wars; between 1816 and 1830; and published posthumously in 1832. On War is one of the most important treatises on political-military analysis and strategy ever written; and remains both controversial and an influence on strategic thinking. Clausewitz was among those intrigued by the manner in which the leaders of the French Revolution; especially Napoleon; had changed the conduct of war through their ability to motivate the populace and to gain access to the full resources of the state; thus unleashing war on a greater scale than had previously been seen in Europe. Clausewitz was well educated and had strong interests in art; history; science; and education. He was a professional soldier who spent a considerable part of his life fighting against Napoleon. The insights he gained from his political and military experiences; combined with a solid grasp of European history; allowed Clausewitz to write a definitive book on military strategy. This book contains all three volumes of On War; and includes an introduction; a biography; and annotations. This edition is limited to 1;000 copies.
#473380 in Books Prometheus Books 2016-10-25 2016-10-25Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.40 x 1.10 x 6.30l; 1.25 #File Name: 1633882454360 pagesPrometheus Books
Review
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful. Great StoryBy historybuffThis is a story told many times. Still; this is a well-written book that contrasts Grant and Lee. Anyone interested in the last year of the Civil War battles in Virginia will find this book interesting and very accessible.0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. I wanted to like the bookBy Ronald J DenhamI felt the writing delivered less than the premise. I wanted to like the book. The idea that one didn't understand the strategy of the other is appealing. However; the appearance of the phrase that Lee didn't understand Grant's mind every chapter seemed repetitive - with insufficient evidence and analysis. Sorry.0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. but it wasn't a bad history.By Mark LaJoieI don't think the author really demonstrated his psychological thesis; but it wasn't a bad history.
